Oct
22
2009
--

Realtime Now Web what ?

FAIR & SQUARE

Jun 19, 2009 : Real Time Data

May 24, 2009: Now Web 

In case you still wonder … search google and twitter deal.

there are like million say on my head, to every PUNK in jordan, who in last 3 months, were just try to promote themself  AS SOCIAL MEDIA or SEO company in jordan or even middle east !

GOD…am thinking to print this logo then place it on door step of our offices, or just rent billboard :

Ain’t the same ** ballpark. It ain’t the same league, it ain’t even the same ** sport.”…TOTALLY DIFFERENT GAME !

 

Aug
25
2009
4

Twitter + SEO + NOW WEB + GOOGLE

action

Below some questions and wonders, we have as company, some we know for sure the answer, rest are open to discuss :

1. Does Twitter have any effect on your SEO plan ?

Yes and No..if your story gets many RT , then you will get free links back.

2. Is Twitter  the first stage of NOW WEB ?

Well we think yes…and it will get another shapes soon if you bring cellphones to the game.

3.What if google buys Twitter ?

Not a good thing ..but if Microsoft gets Twitter, the Revolution will start, we want Google to feel the losing taste to kick things.

4. How far google is from NOW WEB?

6 months late ! but craweling is getting better day after day.

5. Does my blog have higher chance to be in NOW WEB than my site?

Yes of course, unless you have news site and google knows about it.

6. What should i do ?

Go extreme on everything . Never delay any plan.Things will get new shapes within 6-18 months from now. 

@amous

Aug
17
2009
2

Google ‘Caffeine’

As you may have heard, Google recently announced testing of a
new, more powerful version of their search engine technology.

It’s code-named “Caffeine

Now, as business people who rely on SEO, any time Google gives
us some insights into what they have planned for the future, we
need to pay attention.

So what can we learn from what Google is telling us about the
future of search?  Here’s a quote I think is particularly
telling:

“It’s the first step in a process that will let us push the
envelope on size, indexing speed, accuracy, comprehensiveness
and other dimensions.”

I think that one sentence tells us all we need to know about
where we need to be moving, and here’s how:
1. Size and Indexing Speed: This tells us that Google is going
to be crawling more pages and indexing them FASTER.  This
continues Google’s focus on fresh content – so many new pages
are created every day, they can’t keep up.

2. Accuracy: This indicates that the sites that will continue
to “win” the search game are going to be the ones that can
correctly match up the searcher’s keywords with the content
they were actually looking for.  Google indicates that they’re
interested not only in what sites people click on, but what the
searcher’s behavior is once they arrive.

With that in mind, success will come from testing and adjusting
your pages to better serve your visitors.  It will no longer be
enough to focus on the keywords alone, but on actually making
your content relevant to what those searchers want.

One way to do this is through careful organization of your site
structure, organizing information in ways that people will find
useful, not just search spiders.

3. Comprehensiveness: To me, this indicates that Google will
continue to heap love upon “authority” sites – ones that do a
really good job of completely covering their selected niche.

In Google’s never-ending quest for relevance, Google wants to
see sites that can indicate a thorough and comprehensive
resource for what people are searching for.  This is why it’s
important to continue to build pages that rank for ALL your
relevant keywords.

It’s not just about the individual SERPS, but the “profile”
that a comprehensive site creates.  I can imagine that this
focus could be partly to combat “SERP Spamming” tactics where
results are flooded with multiple, largely identical copies of
the same information spread across multiple Web 2.0 sites.

More and more, it’s going to be important to create sites with
larger and larger collections of content in order to really
dominate the listings.

Once again, Google shows that they prefer larger, older sites
that are packed with useful information.

So even though there’s been a lot of buzz around this
announcement and lots of speculation, I don’t think you need to
change too much if you’re already doing your SEO the StomperNet
way.  What’s working in Google now for us appears to be exactly
what they want to encourage.  In fact, they want MORE of it,
FASTER.

So get started today, so by the time Caffeine comes out of
BETA, you’ll be so far ahead of your competition they may never
be able to catch up…call
aigcmiddleast

This post also published on aigc north america call us ;)

Aug
10
2009
--

Bing

The follow post was publish on AIGC north america blog:

Google still has most of the market share and in a way, combining the two lesser search engines actually will save SEO types time and effort in the long run, since they are not dealing with rankings on two different engines with different algorithms.  If you use Yahoo Site Explorer or other tools on a regular basis, you might want to consider finding alternatives – with Bing taking over, these may not be available for long.

Continue reading: Google and Bing

Jul
17
2009
--

How Google determines ranking on Local Business Listings

According to Google, all Local Search results are based primarily on relevance. Google will rank local business listings based on their relevance to the search terms entered, along with geographic distance (where indicated) and other factors. Sometimes the search technology decides that a business that’s farther away from your location is more likely to have what you’re looking for than a business that’s closer.

Google doesn’t say (nor should they) how a business can be listed toward the top of these results. Just like SEO, there are many contributing factors. Currently, location, Yellow Page listings and local Internet advertising do seem to help. Although you don’t need a website to be listed in Google Local, a properly optimized site can be a big plus.

Google Maps and the Local Business Center are a free service, so there’s no way to request or pay for a better ranking. Google does keep the details of the algorithm confidential in order to make the ranking system as fair as possible for everyone, however by increasing the information in your listing (as well as links back to your website), updating your free listing can only help your SEO efforts.

Local SEO for your website
In addition to claiming your Local Business profile, you should also make an initial effort on your hospital website to enable local SEO. Make sure to include your hospital’s address and contact information on every page of your hospital site (and make sure the contact information can be read by the search engines – and not part of a graphical image),

Written by amous in: random | Tags: , , ,
May
24
2009
2

Now Web

It’s easy to imagine Google falling further behind in the real-time content game. The company’s slow entry puts it in the position Yahoo has held for years in search: behind the leader, always playing catch-up instead of spending creative energy on new advances. Google has struggled with social content, producing mixed results. Orkut, for example, was a hit in Brazil, but not in other major markets; initiatives like Friend Connect have shown little traction. It’s had better success as a search partner, as with its Myspace deal.

Google’s search engine has thrived because PageRank uses democratic algorithms that tracked page links. By contrast, real-time discovery engines like Twitter and Facebok use a more dynamic kind of democracy, linking to content that users finds worthwhile. As a result, content on the web is splitting into two basic models, and understanding this distinction makes clear why Google’s centralized role is being threatened.

Simply put, it’s the difference between discovery and search, between the “Now Web” and the “Then Web.” Here’s a more specific analogy: In college, most of us spent a lot of time in the library but also in a social hub like the campus coffee shop. One was a place for digging up information, the other a more dynamic, conversational setting, where ideas were casually exchanged. Google has been the web’s library: archival, organized and oriented around research. Twitter and Facebook, on the other hand, are coffee shops: instantaneous, conversational and oriented around discovery.

I doubt Google will ever make a good coffee shop. But I also don’t see real-time content shutting down its library. Instead, it’s breaking open a new arena of the web over which Google has little control. That makes Google more of a specialized player, but still relevant.

Of course, Google is going to try to dominate this new terrain, just as it does in search. To that end, it essentially has three immediate options: It can buy Twitter or Facebook. It can create a competitor to them on its own. Or it can partner with them – maybe indexing their content into its search and even buying a small investment stake to deter similar deals with Yahoo and Microsoft.

A buyout is unlikely: Twitter has said it’s not for sale and Facebooks seems more interested at raising money to remain independent. Google’s efforts to replicate their success on its own, meanwhile, have disappointed. So it’s more likely to forge partnerships, giving it a place at the table but not the lead spot.

Such an ancillary role won’t satisfy Google for very long. Sharing more and more of the pie with others can’t really be much of an option at the Googleplex. In that case, Google has one last, longer-term option – hitting the upstarts where they are weak. For Twitter, that means its lack of an efficient filter. Google built a great filter for the millions of URLs scattered on the web. Its engineers will be working to do the same for real-time content with the hope that Google can maintain its role as gatekeeper to the web.

But whether or not Google succeeds, its presence in real-time search would push Twitter and Facebook to innovate that much faster, thus accelerating the web’s evolution even more.

 

Written by amous in: random | Tags: , , , ,
Mar
28
2009
--

Bragging and show off

Had you met one of our team ?

if not ..we are really not the show off type “most time“, but when we DO things no one can, We tend to show off plus bragging …almost the world is so small to contain us.

So what is the buzz and fuzz about ?

We love Bloggersmosaic  and all the seo and sem works we have on it.

Today we where checking on the 1500 twitter followers  post  after publishing it …well check these shots:

P.S If you don’t get the shots story …you are so so far from SEO and SEM ..call us to help you TODAY!

41 minutes index on google homepage

41 minutes index on google homepage

 

The rest can be found on Bloggersmosaic flickr  .

Written by amous in: random | Tags: , , , , ,

Member of The face of blogosphere. AIGC MIDDLEAST on Twitter. Log in